X

Sign in

Sign in to confirm

Have you forgotten your password?

... or login with Facebook:

Don't have an AndroidPIT account yet? Sign up

Beta Of App Inventor For Android Released

Douglas Carter
4

Starting today, Google is offering a software tool developed with the goal of making it easier for users with no programming knowledge to create apps. Engadget writes that Android App Inventor "relies on visual blocks rather than oodles of arcane code, the App Inventor -- still in Beta, of course -- has functions for "just about anything" you can do with an Android handset, including access to GPS and phone functionality."

According to the App Inventor page:

To use App Inventor, you do not need to be a developer. App Inventor requires NO programming knowledge. This is because instead of writing code, you visually design the way the app looks and use blocks to specify the app's behavior.

The App Inventor team has created blocks for just about everything you can do with an Android phone, as well as blocks for doing "programming-like" stuff-- blocks to store information, blocks for repeating actions, and blocks to perform actions under certain conditions. There are even blocks to talk to services like Twitter.

TechCrunch takes a slightly more pessimistic view of the release of this program:

It also makes it easy for “regular” people to make apps. But as many web developers will tell you, the rise of WYSIWYG editors in their field led to an explosion of shitty websites.

Tools like Dreamweaver and eventually online WYSIWYG HTML editors from the likes of Geocities, made it so easy for anyone to create webpages that the web quickly filled up with garbage. Thankfully (and appropriately), Google popped up to restore of sense of order to the madness with Pagerank and its search engine. This allowed people to wade through the junk and still be able to find the quality sites.

Check out the video showing App Inventor in action:

TechCrunch also notes that there is a flip-side to giving nearly anyone the ability to create an app:

Because this new tool makes it easy for anyone to make their own apps, it makes the idea of trying to create your own app a much less daunting one. And that’s the powerful thing here. If this tool can get some kid to start messing around with app creation, maybe they’ll get more interested and start learning actual Java. And then maybe one day they’ll create the next killer app.

Interested? The New York Times mentions some important note on how to get started:

A sign-up with a Google Gmail account is required. The tool is Web-based except for a small software download that automatically syncs the programs created on a personal computer, connected to the application inventor Web site, with an Android smartphone.

Head over here to fill out an application and get developing.

Other Sources: Engadget, TechCrunch, The New York Times

Image from Engadget

Related Topics

Related Articles

Magazine / Apps
4 3 days ago

New Android apps you should check out in September 2014

Magazine / Apps
11 4 days ago

Hangouts update: 10 things you need to know about Google Voice and Hangouts Dialer

Magazine / Updates
11 1 week ago

Chrome for Android update brings Android L Material Design

Comments

Write new comment:
  • aijin28 Jul 12, 2010 Link

    Looks like a visual basic for android XD

    0
    0
  • Fabien Roehlinger Jul 12, 2010 Link

    Yeah, kind of...

    0
    0
  • Markus Schaumann Jul 13, 2010 Link

    Actually not! Yet VB is design driven too, it doesn't come with a fully visual programming interface like AppInventor does. In VB you still have to write your own code (eg for event handlers) into the code-behind files.

    AppInventor is explicitly targeting educational purposes and using a fully visual programming interface is exactly what might make this very interesting for educators and beginners. Though possible results are restricted due to the nature of this aproach.

    0
    0
  • Fabien Roehlinger Jul 13, 2010 Link

    Unfortunately, I do not have an invitation yet. I tried to register but I couldn't get in straight away.

    0
    0