Android Forum » Motorola Android Phones » Motorola Droid Bionic Forum » Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display?
Motorola Droid Bionic — Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display?
|
Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:32:05 PM |
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:35:13 PM — modified on Sep 21, 2011 6:10:11 PM by moderator
Super AMOLED plus has square RGB pixel structure, so it addressed the text sharpness issues in previous Super AMOLED while retaining all the good characters of Super AMOLED display. I think it's quite perfect.
|
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:36:48 PM — modified on Sep 21, 2011 6:12:04 PM by moderator I think it's quite perfect. |
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:42:11 PM — modified on Sep 21, 2011 6:10:41 PM by moderator
I've owned the iPhone 4, Galaxy S, S2, and now the Atrix. Here's what you gotta know:
"Retina Display" (i4): Fantastic resolution, nice contrasts. Doesn't wash out in direct sunlight. AMOLED (N1) Suprisingly bad in direct sun, fantastic viewing angles. Super AMOLED (captivate)'s colors were over saturated, and uses a lot of juice. Somewhat hard to see in sunlight "qHD" (Atrix): Whites look great. I have zoomed up very close and not noticed pixels. Good in sunlight. |
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:42:31 PM — modified on Sep 21, 2011 6:10:58 PM by moderator
Samsung Super AMOLED all the way and don't even think twice about it. It's a great phone, awesome screen and just amazing.
|
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:42:54 PM — modified on Sep 21, 2011 6:12:16 PM by moderator
Thanks everyone. Fran, it sounds like your favorite was the Bionic. Am I right?
|
|
|
RE: Bionic qHD vs Samsung Super AMOLED Display? created on Aug 24, 2011 6:44:08 PM
Yeah, I would recommend that over the bunch of 'em.
|
