Steven Blum
- Forum posts: 882
Jul 4, 2011, 4:07:14 PM via Website
Jul 4, 2011 4:07:14 PM via Website
leo69
- Forum posts: 1
May 16, 2023, 9:55:09 AM via Website
May 16, 2023 9:55:09 AM via Website
The LG Thrill 4G and HTC Evo 3D were both smartphones released in 2011 that featured 3D capabilities. While they were similar in some aspects, there were also notable differences between the two. Here's a brief comparison:
Design and Display:
LG Thrill 4G: The Thrill 4G featured a 4.3-inch glasses-free 3D LCD display with a resolution of 480 x 800 pixels. It had a sleek design with a curved back and physical navigation buttons.
HTC Evo 3D: The Evo 3D had a 4.3-inch glasses-free 3D LCD display with the same resolution as the Thrill 4G. It had a more angular design with a unique kickstand at the back.
Camera:
LG Thrill 4G: The Thrill 4G had a dual 5-megapixel camera setup on the back for capturing 3D photos and videos. It also had a front-facing 1.3-megapixel camera.
HTC Evo 3D: The Evo 3D also featured a dual 5-megapixel camera setup on the back for 3D photography and videography. It had a front-facing 1.3-megapixel camera as well.
Hardware and Performance:
LG Thrill 4G: The Thrill 4G was powered by a dual-core 1GHz processor, 512MB of RAM, and had 8GB of internal storage. It also had expandable storage via a microSD card slot.
HTC Evo 3D: The Evo 3D had a similar hardware configuration, with a dual-core 1.2GHz processor, 1GB of RAM, and 4GB of internal storage. It also supported expandable storage through a microSD card.
Software:
Both phones ran on Android 2.3 Gingerbread at the time of release and had their respective custom user interfaces overlaid on top.
Battery:
LG Thrill 4G: The Thrill 4G had a 1500mAh battery.
HTC Evo 3D: The Evo 3D featured a slightly larger 1730mAh battery.
Overall, the LG Thrill 4G and HTC Evo 3D were fairly similar in terms of specifications, as both offered 3D capabilities and were released around the same time. The choice between the two often came down to personal preference in terms of design and brand loyalty. However, it's important to note that both devices are quite dated by today's standards, and there have been significant advancements in smartphone technology since their release
Recommended editorial content
With your consent, external content is loaded here.
By clicking on the button above, you agree that external content may be displayed to you. Personal data may be transmitted to third-party providers in the process. You can find more information about this in our Privacy Policy.