We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.
These Images Prove Samsung Didn't Copy Apple's Design
Samsung Apple Hardware 3 min read 5 comments

These Images Prove Samsung Didn't Copy Apple's Design

In the Samsung vs. Apple trial, the burden is on Samsung to prove that the design of smartphones like the Galaxy S were in the pipeline long before the iPhone came into being. On that end, Samsung wanted to submit to the court a whole bunch of smartphones – like the F700 – that seem iPhone-y and were either dreamed up or actually released before the global introduction of the iPhone. But Judge Koh has strangely rejected the inclusion of these designs on the grounds that the information was furnished too late in the "discovery proccess."

This has lead to no small amount of drama in the courtroom. Yesterday, Samsung's lawyer John Quinn went ahead and released the slides they were going to show the jury to the press. The evidence contained within "would have established, beyond a doubt that Samsung did not copy the iPhone design," according to Quinn. You can take a look at the evidence for yourself in the pictures below.


In these slides, you can see what Samsung was considering putting on the market in the summer of 2006, six months before the unveiling of the iPhone. The last slide shows all the prototypes Samsung was developing (it's not clear whether that last one may actually still make it to trial since it was found in a redacted trial brief on the Verge's website). One of these phones (on the bottom-right) became the Samsung F700 — a phone Apple tried to sue Samsung over, before they realized it was created and brought to market before the iPhone.

Prior art is one of the biggest defenses to design patents, and I for one can't believe Judge Koh wouldn't allow these images to be seen in a courtroom. Already, many are calling for Judge Koh to recuse herself from the case, as it appears she has already made up her mind. No doubt Samsung will appeal the court's decision on the grounds that this evidence couldn't be presented – and they will probably win, too. 

But more importantly, these images prove, conclusively, that Sammy was hard at work on their current line of smartphones way before the iPhone was released, making Apple's claims that Sammy stole their design seem absurd. Apple wants to present a case that the iPhone was developed within a tech vaccuum, and that's simply not the case. Here's hoping Samsung can still get their point across without the slides above. 

Source: OS News


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Hmmm, either that or incredible incompetence on Samsung's end.

  • The slides were furnished to late in the "discovery process", I smell a RAT !

  • You only need to read the comments on TheVerge to know something similar DOES happen.

    In comments, they are playing a variant of stone, paper, scissors: facts, opinion, rumors. Rumors overwhelm opinion, facts dismiss rumors and opinion ignores facts... ;)

  • Okay, I may have been overreaching, but you get the point. :)

  • "without a shadow of doubt" is such a hard term. A die hard Apple fanboy might still claim they somehow got leaked insider information of Apple's design prior to announcement and rushed to copy. These accusations will never go away... :)