We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

2 min read 5 comments

U.S. Judge Who Ruled Against Apple Wants to Eliminate Software Patents

The same judge who threw out Apple's injunction against Motorola has said he wonders whether patents should cover software or most any industries at all. Richard Posner, a judge who has been at it for over two decades, thinks that the constant "struggle for survival," leads tech companies into the courtroom when they should be coming up with the next innovative idea. 

"As in any jungle, the animals will use all the means at their disposal, all their teeth and claws that are permitted by the ecosystem," Posner told Reuters. The judge blames the courts, not the companies, for the current patent mess we're in. Simply put, there are far too many patents needed to build a smartphone, which keeps the competition from really innovating. "You just have this proliferation of patents," Posner said. "It's a problem."

When Apple attempted to ban Motorola's phones because of an individual feature like streaming video, Posner spoke for many when he said Apple's patent "is not a claim to a monopoly of streaming video!" AKA, you can't bar an entire phone because of a single patent you have. We couldn't have said it better ourselves.

Seriously, can this guy preside over every patent trial from now on? We need a lot more of Posner's matter-of-fact logic over in Silicon Valley. While completely eliminating patents may seems ludicrous, perhaps it's the less ludicrous than the fact that Apple and Samsung have each spent tens of millions of dollars defending their innovations. Now just imagine trying to design the next great smartphone if you don't have all that cash around. It's impossible. Who knows; if it weren't for this whole circus, maybe we'd have bendable displays by now.

Source: Reuters


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Its nice to hear a Judge who allows "common sense" to rule judgement (& now its time for every Smart Phone Developer to impress us Consumers by bringing innovative Electronic Products for us to purchase) ...

    Meanwhile, WIRED Magazine offers up a great article on the most compelling Smart Phone's of 2012 (so far, Android has the tech savvy impressed) ...


    I was in agreement about the write up on Verizon Wireless' HTC DROID INCREDIBLE 4G (although, on sale at Walmart for $180, it could be my next Android Smart Phone - & your's - if you <3 using an Android with just one hand) ...


  • Raj Jul 11, 2012 Link to comment

    I entirely agree. Patents can be retained for major innovation calling for billions of dollars of investment. In software this has no meaning. Reputed companies patent sliding action to unlock a mobile phone as a patent which can be done by any amateur program personnel. Unfortunately such patents are being utilized to choke competition...A tool to circumvent Monopoly Restrictive Trade ..Is this fair....Patents in software needs a totally different approach.

  • I agree!

  • i agree with brandan

  • I completely agree...this is getting ridiculous and is hindering true innovation.