UI/UX: The Evolution Of Smiley

  • Replies:1
smxsmxsmx
  • Forum posts: 1

Mar 18, 2013, 6:53:11 AM via Website

Dear androidpit forum,

We are working on a mobile app for Android.

The aim is to inspire the user to discover and express himself through a visual interesting and complex emotional statement.
The user creates a badge saved as a jpeg that he can share to any network.

Concerning the User Interface it all starts with choosing a Smiley to convey a basic emotion.

The complexity of the emotional statement arises from following layers which are not part of this topic.

I attach three different versions.

Generally, by swiping the Smiley-parts at the sides of the screen the user is able to change the basic emotion as seen in version 1.
But what we are actually concerned with is a quantification or refinement of the Smiley.

This is especially difficult because of integration of typography.

Every Smiley is named different and each version of refinement is needing a visually pleasing and functioning positioning of either other Smiley name tags (version 1) or adjectives (version 2) or visually represented quantification (version 3 through a circle scale).
Version1:
To refine the mood means to alter the Smiley and its name tag itself. The user is able to either weak (-) or boost (+) it.


For the second and third version a quantification of the Smiley will be visually expressed apart from the Smiley.
The second version tries to achieve this effect by adjectives and the third version by a percentage circle scale.


All in all the interaction must be straight-forward to use and the shared jpeg easy to read. The "audience" that would read the shared jpeg needs to understand the Smiley as chosen out of a variety of Smiley and furthermore quantified and therefore deeply personal.

I attached gifs to convey interactivity.

Version 1:



Version 2:


Version 3:




Which approach do you like more?

Is anything concerning the position of typography or genereal design unpleasant?

Feedback is very much appreciated, Many thanks

Reply
Thomas Peng
  • Forum posts: 10

Mar 22, 2013, 10:23:58 AM via Website

didn't really get it

Reply