— modified on Dec 26, 2013 3:56:16 PM
I've tried for quite some time an SIII mini, which has 1 GB of ram and it lagged, but it may be definitely Samsung's fault.
Oh, and you should also notice that the more RAM you have, the more the system consumes. After Kitkat, Android should work with as little as 512MB, thus I guess 1 GB should be quite enough, if the system is not full of bloatware.
— modified on Jan 13, 2014 8:53:05 PM
--I do a good impression of myself--
- Admin
- Forum posts: 2,324
Jan 14, 2014 7:41:09 AM via Website
Jan 14, 2014 7:41:09 AM via Website
Forum Rules - Recommended for new AndroidPIT members! / Important to all community members: please read before posting
- Admin
- Forum posts: 2,324
Jan 16, 2014 5:53:38 AM via Website
Jan 16, 2014 5:53:38 AM via Website
well, i guess Android devices are being preferred because they have cost cutting factors if i have to invest such a amount in Android then i am definitely going to to prefer iPhone not Android. So, i would say for getting 1GB of RAM you need to spend around $150-$160 but in order to get 2GB RAM i would have to spend around $200-$250. Why don't i go for iPhone instead of Android. that would costs same around $200.
Forum Rules - Recommended for new AndroidPIT members! / Important to all community members: please read before posting
well, i guess Android devices are being preferred because they have cost cutting factors if i have to invest such a amount in Android then i am definitely going to to prefer iPhone not Android. So, i would say for getting 1GB of RAM you need to spend around $150-$160 but in order to get 2GB RAM i would have to spend around $200-$250. Why don't i go for iPhone instead of Android. that would costs same around $200.
— modified on Jan 16, 2014 7:34:32 AM
I agree with Nik, that Android is preferable for customization and flexibility. If you buy an iPhone, you'll end up with a clean-running device that does everything nicely as long as the ghost of Steve Jobs approves of what you're doing. If you buy an Android phone, you can upgrade your storage space, replace your battery when you need to (on most phones, that is) and have a much more flexible UI experience.
Windows phones are pretty cost-effective, but the downside is you lose a few hundred thousand app choices by going with their app store.
--I do a good impression of myself--
I agree with Nik, that Android is preferable for customization and flexibility. If you buy an iPhone, you'll end up with a clean-running device that does everything nicely as long as the ghost of Steve Jobs approves of what you're doing. If you buy an Android phone, you can upgrade your storage space, replace your battery when you need to (on most phones, that is) and have a much more flexible UI experience.
Windows phones are pretty cost-effective, but the downside is you lose a few hundred thousand app choices by going with their app store.
- Forum posts: 11
Apr 21, 2014 6:50:40 PM via Website
Apr 21, 2014 6:50:40 PM via Website
I GB is not enough for me. There are 50+ apps currently installed on my device. Usually, apps consume almost 1.6 GB RAM when running it on full capacity.
- Forum posts: 1
Jun 6, 2014 12:20:02 PM via Website
Jun 6, 2014 12:20:02 PM via Website
Like a pc can never have enough.I would say though a gig over what they recommend running on any os..
- Forum posts: 1
Jun 6, 2014 12:46:35 PM via Website
Jun 6, 2014 12:46:35 PM via Website
I have Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos and it has 1gb of RAM 524 mb is being used out of 1024.
I think 1 GB of RAM should be a minimum today, even though Kitkat has been tuned to run with less.
The problem usually is the skin some OEMs burden their devices with, using up lots of RAM for no purpose.
That being said, I've been switching most of my old phones over to custom ROMs (shout out to the cool dudes at SlimROMs) which take up considerably less RAM. My oldest device is a Samsung Galaxy S which is now running smoothly with Kitkat and only 512 MB RAM. My daily driver, a Samsung Note 2, has 2 GB of RAM and is running super-smooth with Kitkat as well. So like others have said, more is always better, but the benefits seem to become less noticeable beyond 2 GB of RAM IMHO.
Thought I read somewhere that starting with KitKat (or maybe even Jelly Bean) Android intelligently dumps apps that have been idle for too long (however long that is) and so maintains a reasonable amount of free GB running space.
Seems to equate with what I see, in that there's never more than about 60% of the 1 GB RAM used up, despite having over 60 apps to choose from (not all running at once of course). Whatever the actual technique, the OS always seems fast and smooth, no task killers needed. I think the original Moto X proved it was about the how phone as a whole was put together.
2GB of ram is required to play most graphics intensive games.I have a crappy Xperia C3 and its only have 1GB of RAM.Games and apps constantly crashing on it even YouTube and Angry Birds Epic.
The x8 chipset on the 2013 was genius did not benchmark well but ran smooth as butter with any given task pure brilliance
- Forum posts: 79
Oct 10, 2016 7:52:14 AM via Website
Oct 10, 2016 7:52:14 AM via Website
I think 1GB is now enough for Android gadget. I know, numerous cell phone producers put excessively numerous bloatwares and pre-stacked applications on their Android gadgets. Be that as it may, you can simply handicap them or evacuate those superfluous applications by establishing the telephone. My telephone just uses 1GB of RAM and leaves around 700MB free RAM and this is as of now enough for me since i can simply KILL or compel close the previuos application at whatever point i need to open new applications or play amusement.