We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

Moto G vs Moto E: the best budget smartphones around

Moto G vs Moto E: the best budget smartphones around

Motorola were kind enough to hand deliver a Moto E to us yesterday and we've put the budget beast through its paces. Putting it side by side with the Moto G highlights some key differences however, that may help you make your choice between the two low-cost champions. Either way you cut it though, Motorola has pretty much redefined what we can expect from a budget smartphone with these two devices.

br teaser
The budget smartphone landscape has been completely revolutionized by Motorola. / © AndroidPIT

Design and Manufacture

It's tempting to say both devices have the same build quality, but this isn't entirely true. Sure, both are made of the same plastic and look pretty similar, but the battery cover of the Moto E rattles a little whereas the Moto G feels more solid. The Moto E has a microSD card slot hidden behind that cover though. Button locations are the same, but the Moto E is missing a front-facing camera and rear-mounted speaker, instead placing the speaker up front. In fact, the prominent speaker and earpiece grills on the front of the Moto E are the most visually distinctive feature between the two devices. As far as dimensions go, the Moto G has a larger footprint, but the Moto E is marginally thicker. This, combined with its smaller size generally make it feel a bit more chunky in the hand than the Moto G.

moto g moto e side
Very similar design-wise, although the Moto E (bottom) is a little thicker, the Moto G a little larger. / © AndroidPIT
moto g moto e low
The speaker on the Moto E (right) has been moved to the front. / © AndroidPIT


The Moto G comes in with a 4.5-inch display, whereas the Moto E has a 4.3-inch screen. Both are IPS LCD. The main difference is in the quality of the screen. The Moto E has qHD resolution (960x540 pixels) and the Moto G HD (1,280x720 pixels), loading the Moto G up with 326 ppi compared to the Moto E's 256 ppi. The lower pixel density, combined with the smaller screen size and slightly less impressive graphics processor clearly make the Moto E a budget device when it comes to visuals whereas the Moto G can still scrape by.

Link to Video

Interface and software

Both devices come running Motorola's very vanilla flavored version of Android 4.4.2 although it seems likely that the Moto G will receive updates marginally longer than the Moto E. The Moto E is, however, guaranteed at least one update to Android 4.4.3, but whatever comes after that is open to debate. It seems fair to say that the Moto G will make the jump to whatever version appears at Google I/O in June. As far as Android experience goes right now though, the two devices are identical, and getting this clean and current an Android experience on such low-cost devices is a straight up blessing.

moto g moto e top
The Moto G (left) has a slightly larger display with higher pixel density for a sharper image. / © AndroidPIT
moto g moto e back
The Moto E has no LED flash and moves the speaker from the back to the front. / © AndroidPIT


This is where things get interesting. The Moto E, like the Moto G, has a 5 MP camera on the back of the device, but no LED flash. It also doesn't have a front-facing camera at all, for selfies or video chatting. These two glaring omissions are going to be serious downsides for anyone that considers photography an important component of their smartphone. The Moto G on the other hand has a 1.3 MP front-facing camera. Both Moto G cams are entirely acceptable for the price, but not mind-blowing by any stretch. The Moto E also doesn't have touch to focus like the Moto G, so that's a big negative if you're not a fan of a fixed focus point.

moto g moto e cam sidebar
Both Motos have a 5 MP main camera, but the Moto E has no front-facing camera, no LED flash or tap-to-focus. / © AndroidPIT

Hardware and Performance

Apart from the slightly larger screen and better resolution, the Moto G also has better processing power. The Moto G has a quad-core 1.2 GHz processor while the Moto E has the same speed processor but with only two cores. The Moto G also has slightly better graphics processor than the Moto E, an Adreno 305 versus an Adreno 302, respectively. You can notice the lags on both devices when compared to the Moto X, but for budget devices there is absolutely nothing wrong with the performance of either, made possible by Motorola's excellent optimizations. Nevertheless, the Moto G is snappier and more responsive than the Moto E, for obvious reasons. The Moto E comes in only one storage capacity, 4 GB, whereas the Moto G has 8 GB and 16 GB versions. The Moto E is now being touted as having a water-resistant coating, but as we showed in our Moto G water test, it can handle some immersion too. The Moto E has a louder speaker but it sounds worse than the Moto G.

moto g moto e front
Moto G (left), Moto E (right). / © AndroidPIT

Technical specifications

Manufacturer Motorola Motorola
OS Android 4.3/ update to 4.4 Android 4.4.2 
Display 4.5-inch, LCD (1,280 x 720), 326 ppi  4.3-inch , LCD(960 x 540), 256 ppi
Processor Quad-Core Snapdragon 400, 1.2 GHz Dual-core Snapdragon 200, 1.2 GHz
Internal storage 8/16 GB 4 GB + microSD (up to 32 GB)
Camera 5 MP (back), LED flash, 1.3 MP (front) 5 MP (back)
Battery 2,070 mAh 1,980 mAh
Connectivity GSM, CDMA, HSPA+, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0 GSM, CDMA, HSPA+, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Waterproof No (unofficially water-resistant) No (officially water-resistant)
Dimensions 129.9 x 65.9 x 6-11.6 mm / 143 grams 124.8 x 64.8 x 12.3 mm / 142 grams
Price 179 USD (8 GB) / 199 USD (16 GB)  179 CAD (4 GB) (approx 129 USD), 89 GBP, 6999 INR 
moto g moto e cam
The Moto E may have a sloppy rear cover, but it is officially water-resistant and hides a microSD card slot. / © AndroidPIT


The Moto E is without a doubt a ground-breaking device, cementing the excellent reputation established by the Moto G. The addition of a microSD card slot will please many people, and ditching a large internal memory does away with the manufacturing component cost so customers can choose their own level of storage (and pay accordingly) post-purchase. However, some peculiar camera decisions on the Moto E are going to be a deal-breaker for many.

Other differences between the Moto G and Moto E can perhaps be forgiven (smaller screen, lower pixel density, less powerful processor, less storage) when you think about the price, but if you look at the Canadian price for the Moto E (179 CAD), all of a sudden the differences become significant: an unlocked 8 GB Moto G only costs 150 CAD. The same price differential doesn't hold for all markets though (6,999 INR, 12,999 INR in India, for example). So while the Moto E may realistically be a cheaper Moto G, in my mind, the Moto G is far and away worth the extra 50 bucks it costs to get one. If you're after a super budget smartphone though, it's impossible to pass up the Moto E.

Source: Motorola

Recommended articles


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • paulc Jun 9, 2014 Link to comment

    The Moto G may not have had the PR job on the splash-proof features but they were mentioned when it came out. Having suffered a write-off of an old phone whose humidity sensor was too touchy, water resistance stood out for me as one feature that would make even a mid-range phone less fragile.

    • I was talking to some execs recently and they talked about the issues involved in claiming water-resistency and using IP ratings. They said as soon as you say water-resistant people think ''waterproof'' and try it out and damage their phones. Then, noone really understands the IP ratings and what they mean in real-life (what does 1 meter under water for 30 minutes equate to under 2.5 meters of water or under 30 cm for an hour etc). So while I appreciate knowing devices can stand a bit of water I also think it's wise not to advertize the fact too much!

      • paulc Jun 11, 2014 Link to comment

        Interesting, that figures anyway. So, let's call it sweat-proof then. ;)

        Beats me why people dunk their slabs as soon as they buy them - there was a guy on here a while back looking for a repairer, all sounded a bit far gone. On YouTube there's a Eurotrash-style video of a Russian(?) woman boiling (or at least simmering) her new Nexus 4 on a hob - amazingly the screen pops back to life after a few minutes. If it's a fake, it's a convincing one. Likewise a German fella dropping one from increasing heights until it cracks. Who are these guys?! Perhaps they get enough back in advertising to buy a new one, just about.
        (Insert smiley for scratch-and-shake-head).

      • Weeeell...we do have some Moto G and Moto E drop tests coming in soon... But I guess they're cheap enough we can afford to break them on occasion. But I agree, I don't quite know what would possess a person to say ''I have a new $700 smartphone...why don't I boil it, drop it, run it over in my car''. Funny thing about sweatproof is that the Gear Fit doesn't pick up your heart rate when you sweat on it... Just sayin....

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing