We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

RAZR i Early Review: Motorola Still Lacks a Flagship

RAZR i Early Review: Motorola Still Lacks a Flagship

Yesterday, Motorola introduced the RAZR i and I must admit, I was a bit disappointed. After the hype died down, I realized this was a mid-level Android phone, not the revolutionary flagship model I was expecting. But no matter: in the end, the RAZR i is still a perfectly decent smartphone for the average, non-techie, consumer.


The i looks like typical Motorola RAZR, with a pleasing design made of high-quality materials. Plastic is a foreign word to Motorola, and the RAZR i brings the same Kevlar backing as the first RAZR Android device. And yet, even with such premium materials, the RAZR i manages to be even lighter than the Galaxy S3. The device weighs just .27 pounds, compared to the S3's .29 pounds. The RAZR i feels incredibly solid, like an expensive device. Quite frankly, the S3 looks cheap in comparison. In this respect, Moto deserves a lot of praise.

 You can tell that Motorola's materials are top-of-the-line compared to those of the Galaxy S3.


I think, in retrospect, I should have been a bit more suspicious of Motorola's claim that they're releasing the world's first phone with an edge-to-edge display. No question, the RAZR i wastes very little space on the front display, but the top and the bottom still have plenty of blank space and the sides of the display frame are about .07-inches thick. That's not a whole lot, and it does make the device easier to hold in one hand without accidentally triggering something on the display. But it's not an edge-to-edge display, as marketed.

And there are other problems...

  • The resolution: Motorola is claiming the color reproduction and general quality of the display on this device is quite high due to, among other things, the minute distance between the display and the glass on top. This is true, but as a Galaxy S3 user, 960x540 pixels are an absolute no-go. Whenever I look at the display of this device, everything looks totally washed out.
  • The glass covering the display is slightly recessed from the frame so that when you swipe your finger across the screen, you can feel where the metal frame raises up. Motorola has probably deliberately sunk the screen to protect it when you lay your phone face down. This is all well and good, but it makes the display feel a bit shoddy and uneven. Another option would have been to just protect the entire front of the screen with Gorilla Glass, which is what many manufacturers are doing these days.

The recessed glass is a bit strange to get used to.


Motorola and Intel are especially proud of their ultra-fast camera. If you press down on the dedicated camera button, the RAZR i's camera starts up in less than a second and in is supposed to be able to take ten shots in as much time. Like a machine gun.

Personally, I'm not so interested in such things. I'm more interested in the camera's abilities; specifically how well it captures light and color. In the London cafe where I was testing this device, the Galaxy S3 beat the RAZR i when it came to capturing light.


The beating heart of the RAZR i is its 2480 Atom processor, part of Intel's Medfield series. It has just just one core, which could lead folks to dismiss it as a piece of scrap metal, but thanks to Intel's "hyper-threading" technology, the system can run two applications simultaneously, thus putting it more in the realm of a dual-core processor.

 Optical illusion: the RAZR i appears thicker than the Galaxy S3. In reality, it just appears that way because its a narrower device.

And, if necessary, the chip can also speed up the pace, clocking in at 2GHz. "It's got more power than a Galaxz S2," said a Motorola rep. Mind you, he's not mentioning the S3 here; the goal isn't for the RAZR i to win first, but simply be able to compete in the market.

Motorola was also careful to highlight improvements made to the way the RAZR i processor JavaScript, which should result in much faster JavaScript execution, noticeable in the browsing experience.

This sounded promising, but I did not notice any improved performance. On the contrary, the decice shuttered a bit when pushed to the limits. But I believe this could be because I'm not using the final version of the software, so I don't want to jump to any conclusions just yet.

A final word about the compatibility of Android apps with Intel's x86 architecture. Intel claims it has already adapted 500 of the most popular apps to its chip, and the others should be able to run on an emulator. "Chrome in particular was a challenge, but we have handled it,"explained an Intel rep. What he emphasized was that Intel takes these concerns very seriously and that the company has the market power to achieve a high level of x86 compatibility.

But all the apps in the Google Play store? I think that's too big a task, even for Intel. Of course, much depends on what the future of Intel and Android looks like. Suffice to say, high sales of the RAZR i are intregal to the success of Intel's future in the Android world.

The beginner-friendly "Quick Settings" menu that appears when you swipe from left to right over the home screen makes it clear to whom Motorola is marketing the Razr i: the average Joe , not the geek.


Conclusion: Where's the Flagship?

We've now arrived at the last and crucial question: how can one categorize the RAZR i? It's certainly not the high-end flagship with the frameless screen which many were hoping for.

But if you consider the way the phone is being positioned in the marketplace, Motorola's strategy, at least, seems a bit clearer. The phone costs 399 Euros and it is expected to fall to 350 Euros shortly after launch. For this price, what is offered is more than good. The model may not appeal to technies and geeks but for the average joe who buys a new phone every couple of years and doesn't care about the processor, the phone delivers. It's got a premium, beautiful design, a powerful battery and a good camera.

I can live with that. Nevertheless, Motorola's greater strategy remains a mystery to me. I was invited to London with great fanfare, only to be shown a phone that hovers between "decent"and "good."But is it even better than the RAZR HD?

In my opinion, every manufacturer needs a flagship to show the world what they can do. These models form the backbone of most smartphone product lines. And all the manufacturers have a model out there which fits this bill – except for Motorola. In my opinion, this could be a real problem for them.

To release a phone in September with Android 4.0.4 is a disappointment. A Jelly Bean update is "in the works," but nothing's happened yet. But there was one nice surprise: At least Motorola decided to unlock the bootloader.

Recommended articles


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • I think this could be Motorola's 1st Android Smart Phone with ICS that's meant for the "No Contract" market (where the RAZR i would be considered a great buy if sold for $300 and under) ....

  • @Steven - Good point on the user side of things. Windows rules PC's because it's a universal app platform. That benefits the users, developers and MS equally. Androids model is great at all levels.... for Google. It may be something they'll be forced to work on once it's a 3 way dog fight for market share.

    Posted from my 4S and typing all this on this tiny screen has SUCKED!

  • I think those are all completely reasonable concerns. With fragmentation already a big problem, Intel's limitations are even more worrisome. The Android experience already differs so widely across multiple platforms that it's hard for newbies to understand that actually their Android experience could be so much better were they to root the device or buy a different model. Already folks like my sister are swearing off Android because they hate the cheap model they ended up with: little do they know that a Nexus or One X or Galaxy S3 offers such a better experience. This is how fragmentation hurts Android: newbies ALWAYS think their Android experience is indicative of the platform at large, and that could really hurt Android's reputation in the long run. Especially if Joe Shmoe buys a RAZR i only to realize later it's incompatible with a few of his favorite apps. Why would he ever buy another Android phone again? The non-geeky types are the ones Android cannot afford to lose. On the other hand, the range of prices and processors and UIs is what keeps Android growing. So it's a delicate balancing act, IMO.

  • I'm particularly interested in the app compatibility of Intel's chip. In the PC world emulators are harder on resources than the native app on native hardware would be. Will emulators be a real option across all of Google Play's offerings? Are we going to wind up with Intel optimized apps and Tegra 3 optimized apps and whoever the next on the scene is? How much fragmentation can the ecosystem stand before everyone winds up with such a small slice of the market that it isn't economically viable anymore and app development suffers? It's probably early for concerns like those but still I wonder.

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing