We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

2 min read 3 comments

[Video] Nuance's Nina Blows Siri Out of the Water

Nuance – famed overloads of Siri – believe you'd rather talk to a computer than click on a screen. The company has just introduced a new, more-versatile version of Siri named Nina, which can be integrated into ANY Android or iOS app. Yup, that's right; you could end up barking orders at your banking app instead of clicking on a button. 

But the big, juicy cherry on top is Nina's voice-analyzing security feature. According to Nuance, Nina will include a feature called Dragon ID which can decipher and authenticate the sound of your voice based on distinctive features of your speech. Baked into an app, Nina could let you, say, pay a phone bill or make a transfer just by talking to your phone. 

I guess the question I'd like to ask now is, does anyone really want what Nuance is offering? I can see voice recognition being useful for utilitarian apps like Maps and Google Translate, but does anyone feel more secure making a banking transaction via voice? Nuance is banking on enterprise developers here, but I think they should be a bit more open-minded. I'd much rather have an app that translated my speech than one which made it slightly easier to pay for my water bill.

Lastly, while I can see this kind of software being helpful in certain situations (ie, when you're alone and don't feel like typing), it's still not really socially acceptable (or advisable) to be barking orders at your phone in public, especially about your bank account. What do you think?

Source: Gizmodo


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Dan, agreed. I still can't talk to Google Now without feeling slightly weird.

    Geoffrey, I also agree! I can't imagine trusting Bank of America (which is the kind of big-name client Nuance is no doubt courting) to know my voice well enough to authorize a transaction. Someone could record me ordering a coffee and use that recording to authorize crazy purchases!

    One work around would be to authenticate a picture or string of words using my voice. But while I suppose that could be a more secure way of handling things, it detracts from the convenience factor.

  • if you're in a public place don't use voice type your information in.

  • I reckon your summary pretty much... ...sums it up. how hard is it to get a recording of somebody's voice if you really want it? does "nina" recognise the difference between a recording of my voice and my actual voice? aside from issues you've already mentioned, this technology still requires much development before being utilised for security purposes! like facial recognition that can't tell the difference between my face and a photo of my face!