We use cookies on our websites. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

Why Is Facebook's App Such a Piece of Crap?

Why Is Facebook's App Such a Piece of Crap?

With almost a million 1 star reviews on Google Play, Facebook's Android app is one of the worst-reviewed, yet most popular, apps ever made. If the Razzies were ever handed out to apps, Facebook's would win, hands-down. Complaints about the app run the gamut; but generally revolve around a few main issues. Users complain the app:

  • Constantly freezes
  • Force crashes
  • Uses way more data than the browser version
  • Is slow to load, even on fast phones
  • Is just plain boring and aesthetically ugly

Why has Facebook, which had revenues this year of upwards of a billion dollars this year, created one of the slowest apps on the market?

The (partial) answer is that Facebook has used the wrong code to create their app and is apparantly too lazy to update it. Here's what Mobtest has to say about Facebook's code:

“For a starter, caching of unchanged content cannot be controlled by the developer. The FB app downloads the whole timeline HTML every time, and it is up to the UIWebView to determine whether it needs to download images, stylesheets etc again…. Also, to communicate from the UIWebView to the native app, a Javascript bridge is needed. This is tricky stuff, slow and not really thread safe.”

For those who have noticed the Facebook app uses the majority of their data; that's why. It downloads the ENTIRE timeline, even if you're not looking at it, every time you open the app. That's also one of the reasons why the app is so slow. 

After nearly a million 1 star ratings on Google Play, and an average rating of 2 stars on iOS, you think Facebook would have gotten the hint and made their app just a tad speedier. But they haven't. Why is THAT? 

Well, a writer at Digital Trends found this little nugget in Facebook's updated S-1 ( a document required of any company that is preparing to go public):

We do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the use of Facebook mobile products, and our ability to do so successfully is unproven. We believe this increased usage of Facebook on mobile devices has contributed to the recent trend of our daily active users (DAUs) increasing more rapidly than the increase in the number of ads delivered. If users increasingly access Facebook mobile products as a substitute for access through personal computers, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our mobile users, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected.

So, Facebook's app sucks because the developers working on it haven't meaningfully updated it, and they haven't done so because Facebook would rather you visit their website anyway. This has got to be one of the worst strategies I've ever read. It's almost as if Facebook wishes mobile would just go away, like they could close their eyes, count to ten, and everyone would go back to farting around on their computers again. (Side note: Is this really the kind of company you'd want to invest in?)

Just for the sake of comparison, have you ever played around with the Google+ app? The thing runs like buttah. Buttah, I tell you. Updates fly on to the screen, profiles are beautiful and take milliseconds to load, and you can even initiate a video hangout with your besties. 

Facebook's app does none of these things. It is slow and stale. If more friends were on Google+, I would drop Facebook's app in a heartbeat. Till then, I'm sticking with m.facebook.com. 

Source: Digital Trends

Recommended articles


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Lane, I agree, Google+ is VERY image-centric.

  • I gave this App a One stare raiting and deinstalled it right after they started requesting the read and wright SMS permisson... Why should i allow them to read all my text messages? I think they know anouth about me from things i shared on Facebook.

  • chinu Aug 9, 2012 Link to comment

    with unnecessary 12 user permissions...... crapiest app ever........

  • Agreed - FACEBOOK needs to see this & implemented changes for the better asap .... Twitter is easy to use

  • I would gladly use their website, but I find too quirky in Android browsers.

    Google+'s app runs OK, but I'm an old guy, and I belong to a generation that reads, rather than just look at pictures. The G+ app does a lousy job with text, giving you only a tiny bit unless you tap the item and then scroll up.

  • It makes sense that Facebook wants users to visit their webpage. That's the place where advertisement are and those are Facebook financial income. Facebook app doesn't has any advertisement on it. People spend more time with their mobile devices. If Facebook app works better than the website, users will eventually stop visiting Facebook through website and companies will spent less on advertising on Facebook.

  • nice written

  • How about the Friendster app? I haven't used it much, but it seems quicker and just better looking than the Facebook app.

  • Ha, thanks Ti Mo! Will do!

  • Ti Mo Aug 8, 2012 Link to comment

    PLEASE send this article to Facebook

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing