X

Sign in

Sign in to confirm

Have you forgotten your password?

... or login with Facebook:

Don't have an AndroidPIT account yet? Sign up

Apple Seeking EU Ban On Galaxy Devices Running Android 2.3 And Higher

Eric McBride
12

 

Apple is certainly making things difficult for Samsung lately, and not only in the United States. The two tech giants recently appeared in a Dutch court, where Apple stated that Galaxy devices running Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) and higher should be banned in the Netherlands due to a multi touch patent called “touch event model”. As Samsung’s distribution center is located in the Netherlands, a ban could very possibly have a widespread effect on the entire European Union.

Apple isn’t only seeking a sales ban, but also a recall of all Galaxy devices running Gingerbread. The touch event model patent (you can view the patent here) is basically the technology that keeps smartphone users from pressing two buttons simultaneously, which is a process that Samsung states works differently on IOS and Android devices. While both operating systems can disable touch input on certain locations on the screen in order to avoid accidental touches, IOS accomplishes this by providing a “view” element on the user interface. Samsung claims that Android’s method, while similar, is more “hierarchical”.

Samsung’s lawyers stated that Apple’s technology is “a very nice invention” but differs from Apple’s method of accomplishing the same function. Samsung lawyer Bas Berghuis van Woortman argued that the Android method is more complex, as well as more difficult for developers to use. Samsung also went on to say that Apple devices don’t allow touch inputs on the OS level, while Android accomplishes this on the application level.

Apple however, isn’t buying it. Apple lawyer Theo Blomme told Judge Blok that Android’s solution solves a multiple input conflict situation in the same way that IOS software does. (ok..I need a sec...my brain is starting to ache).

Samsung then went on to state that the patent itself has no validity due to the fact that it’s similar to other technology. In other words, Apple didn’t invent it, and compared it to DiamondTouch software, which is a solution that allows multiple users to interact with a touch based surface at the same time. Apple then argued that this argument isn’t valid, as DiamondTouch technology is meant for multiple users. The same claims will also be ruled on in a separate trial going on in Germany against Samsung and Motorola Mobility (ruling due later this month), and in the UK against HTC. Samsung and Apple will also appear in court later this month, where Apple claims that Samsung is infringing on a patent for photo gallery scrolling (ah common).

This madness apparently isn’t going to stop anytime soon, and I hope that the European courts will see things a bit more realistically than US courts. The patent in question here also appears to be a direct attack on Android itself, and not any one OEM in particular, meaning that Google could directly get involved (hopefully). But whatever the outcome, it seems pretty safe to say that Apple is just getting warmed up when it comes to new attacks on Android.

Picture credits: admintell.napco.com

Related Topics

Related Articles

Magazine / Hardware
7 3 days ago

What if Samsung made the iPhone 6?

Magazine / Hardware
8 1 week ago

Waterproof, water-resistant, splash proof: what you want from your Android

Magazine / Hardware
8 1 week ago

IFA 2014 wrap-up: new Android phones, tablets and smartwatches [updated]

Comments

Write new comment:
  • Patrick R. Sep 10, 2012 Link

    Now you know when Android became better than iOS - Gingerbread! Haha.

    Apple, the more you pull stunts like this, the more I am convinced you are one of the greatest magicians of this generation. Your reputation is built on nothing more than illusions, smoke and mirrors.

    0
    0
  • Eric McBride Sep 10, 2012 Link

    @Patrick - LOL!

    This is getting sooooooooooo out of control that it's surpassing the line of ridiculous and entering the realm of just plain stupid.

    0
    0
  • Patrick R. Sep 10, 2012 Link

    @Eric, the best part is when lawyers speak as if they fully understand or believe the cr*p they spew out. Amazing.

    0
    0
  • Eric McBride Sep 10, 2012 Link

    I know right! I really wonder sometimes exactly how technically knowledgeable the lawyers on both sides are. Hopefully they know a bit more than the jury members used in these trials.

    0
    0
  • User picture
    Nick N. Sep 10, 2012 Link

    APPLE: WORLD'S WORST TROLL.

    EVER.

    0
    0
  • Eric McBride Sep 10, 2012 Link

    HAHAHAHAHHA!

    So true.

    0
    0
  • DieBagger Sep 10, 2012 Link

    It's maddening what kind of generic crap these guys get patents for...

    I have a few patent ideas:
    - loops
    - basic arithmetic operations (addition, multiplying,...)
    - alphabet
    - breathing

    How about actually making good software instead of wasting OUR money...

    0
    0
  • kss imkum Sep 10, 2012 Link

    Apple keeps giving Samsung one advertising campaign after another .. are they really that " intellectualy bankrupt " after RIP Steve is gone???

    0
    0
  • Eric McBride Sep 10, 2012 Link

    @DieBagger - So true so true. If they put half the money they put into court cases into engineering and software, they would be a lot better off.

    @kss - Sometimes I really wonder the same. But honestly, if Steve were still alive, he would probably be going even harder on Android than Apple is now.

    0
    0
  • Stephen Ma Sep 10, 2012 Link

    if Steve was going harder on Android than he probably would die a few years earlier.

    0
    0
  • Glostermeteor Sep 10, 2012 Link

    Hopefully the EU judge will kick Apples ass back to where it belongs.....the trash bin

    0
    0
  • Eric McBride Sep 10, 2012 Link

    @Glostermeteor - Or the fruit bowl. What about the refrigerator? In juice boxes perhaps? :-D

    0
    0